A Six-Phase High-Speed Turbine Generator for Decentralized Energy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24160/0013-5380-2026-4-41-49Keywords:
постоянные магниты, когенерационная технология, энергетика Арктической зоны, характеристики генератора, шестифазный турбогенератор, оптимизация проектаAbstract
The article addresses matters concerned with optimizing the design of a high-speed six-phase turbine generator for a capacity of 4.5 MW intended for small capacity thermal and nuclear power plants to be located in the Arctic region. To optimize the design, versions of a six-phase turbine generator with two three-phase stator systems shifted by 30 electrical degrees, but with different numbers of slots (72, 48, and 36) while maintaining the basic geometric dimensions, are considered. For the selected versions, numerical calculations of the 2D electromagnetic field were performed using the finite element method, and the values of inductive reactances and current were determined in steady-state short-circuit modes. The advantage of the version with 48 stator slots has been revealed. The frequency spectrum of the magnetization force distribution and the magnetic flux density distribution along the air gap middle line at no-load and rated load have been analyzed in both three-phase and six-phase versions. In the frequency spectrum, the 5th, 7th, 11th, and 13th harmonics are very insignificant for any number of slots, as well as when only one component of the six-phase winding is in operation. In the case of using the six-phase version, it is possible to reduce the power per phase, reduce torque pulsations, reduce the harmonic content of current and voltage, and also to operate in the event of a failure in one of the three-phase systems. The use of a generator with 18,000 rpm rotational speed at small power plants is highly effective when operating in a cogeneration cycle and results in significantly reduced harmful emissions into the atmosphere.
References
1. Глебов И.А., Данилевич Я.Б., Хуторецкий Г.М. Турбогенератор мощностью 1200 МВт, 3000 об/мин. – Электротехника, 1978, № 3, с. 3–10.
2. Хуторецкий Г.М., Воронов Г.Г. Шестифазные обмотки турбогенераторов. – Электротехника, 1968, № 10, с. 9–11.
3. Хуторецкий Г.М., Воронов Г.Г. Схемы замещения, диаграммы и параметры шестифазных неявнополюсных генераторов в установившемся режиме. – Электротехника, 1982, № 11, с. 7–13.
4. Гришин Н.В. Уравнения режимных задач шестифазных турбогенераторов предельной мощности. – Научно-технические ведомости СПбПУ, 2016, № 2 (243), с. 16–23.
5. Гришин Н.В. Схемы замещения для решения режимных задач шестифазных турбогенераторов предельной мощности. – Научно-технические ведомости СПбПУ, 2016, № 2 (243), с. 62–71.
6. Гришин Н.В. Индуктивное сопротивление рассеяния обмотки статора шестифазного турбогенератора предельной мощности. – Научно-технические ведомости СПбПУ. Естественные и инженерные науки, 2017, т. 23, № 4, с. 40–47.
7. Гришин Н.В. Расчетное и экспериментальное определение индуктивных сопротивлений шестифазных турбогенераторов для анализа переходных процессов: автореф. дис. ... канд. техн. наук. СПб., 2020, 22 с.
8. Попков Е.Н., Фешин А.О. Макромодель шестифазной синхронной машины в фазных координатах для исследования процессов в электроэнергетических системах. – Известия НТЦ Единой энергетической системы, 2020, № 2 (83), с. 64–73.
9. Kato S., Rae G., Michihira M. A Comparative Study on Power Generation Characteristics of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators for Green Ship. – Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, 2012, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 378–386, DOI: 10.5916/jkosme.2012.36.3.378.
10. Labak A., Kar N.C. Designing and Prototyping a Novel Five-Phase Pancake-Shaped Axial-Flux SRM for Electric Vehicle Application Through Dynamic FEA Incorporating Flux-Tube Modeling. – IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2013, vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 1276–1288, DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2013.2252871.
11. Ismagilov F.R. et al. The Six-Phase Fault Tolerant Synchronous Generator with Permanent Magnets for Aircraft Application. – Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing, 2020, DOI: 10.1109/ICIEAM48468.2020.9112055.
12. Levi E. Multiphase Electric Machines for Variable-Speed Applications. – IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2008, vol. 55, No. 5, pp.1893–1909, DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2008.918488.
13. Зечихин Б.С., Журавлев С.В., Мисютин Р.Ю. Авиационные генераторы с постоянными магнитами. – Электричество, 2018, № 6, с. 49–59.
14. Barrero F., Duran M.J. Recent Advances in the Design, Modeling, and Control of Multiphase Machines – Part I. – IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 449–458. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2447733.
15. Barrero F., Duran M.J. Recent Advances in the Design, Modeling and Control of Multiphase Machines – Part II. – IEEE Trans-actions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 459–468, DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2448211.
16. Abdel-Khalik S., Ahmed S., Massoud A. A Six-Phase 24 Slot-10 Pole Permanent-Magnet Machine with Low Space Harmonics for Electric Vehicle Applications. – IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, vol. 52, No. 6, DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2535230.
17. Wang J. et al. Study of Multiphase Superconducting Wind Generators with Fractional-Slot Concentrated Windings. – IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2014, vol. 24, No. 3, DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2014.2304300.
18. Karttunen J. et al. Decoupled Vector Control Scheme for Dual Three-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines. – IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2014, vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 2185–2196. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2013.2270219.
19. Bouyahia O., Betin F., Yazidi A. Fault-Tolerant Fuzzy Logic Control of a 6-Phase Axial Flux Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Generator. – Energies, 2022, vol. 15, No. 4, DOI: 10.3390/en15041301.
20. Goncalves P.F.C., Cruz S.M.A., Mendes A.M.S. Comparison of Model Predictive Control Strategies for Six-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines. – 44th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2018, pp. 5801–5806, DOI: 10.1109/IECON.2018.8591239.
21. Naves P.H.B. et al. Modelling and Comparative Performance Analysis of Special Six-phase and Conventional Synchronous Generators for Wind Farm Application. – Renewable Energy & Power Quality Journal, 2009, vol. 1, No. 7, pp. 390–395, DOI: 10.24084/REPQJ07.367.
22. Антипов В.Н., Грозов А.Д., Иванова А.В. Турбогенератор с повышенной частотой вращения для тепловых и атомных станций малой мощности. – Электричество, 2025, № 2, с. 75–83.
23. Нейман Л.Р. Поверхностный эффект в ферромагнитных телах. М.: Госэнергоиздат, 1948, 190 с.
---
Работа выполнена в рамках Госзадания филиала НИЦ «Курчатовский институт» – ПИЯФ – ИХС (регистрационный номер темы 1024030700042-1-1.4.3).
#
1. Glebov I.A., Danilevich Ya.B., Hutoretskiy G.M. Elektrotekh-nika – in Russ. (Electrical Engineering), 1978, No. 3, pp. 3–10.
2. Hutoretskiy G.M., Voronov G.G. Elektrotekhnika – in Russ. (Electrical Engineering), 1968, No. 10, pp. 9–11.
3. Hutoretskiy G.M., Voronov G.G. Elektrotekhnika – in Russ. (Electrical Engineering), 1982, No. 11, pp. 7–13.
4. Grishin N.V. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbPU – in Russ. (Scientific and Technical Bulletin SPbPU), 2016, No. 2 (243), pp. 16–23.
5. Grishin N.V. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbPU – in Russ. (Scientific and Technical Bulletin SPbPU), 2016, No. 2 (243), pp. 62–71.
6. Grishin N.V. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbPU. Estest-vennye i inzhenernye nauki – in Russ. (Scientific and Technical Bulletins of SPbPU. Natural and Engineering Sciences), 2017, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 40–47.
7. Grishin N.V. Raschetnoe i eksperimental’noe opredelenie in-duktivnyh soprotivleniy shestifaznyh turbogeneratorov dlya ana-liza perekhodnyh protsessov: avtoref. dis. ... kand. tekhn. nauk (Computational and Experimental Determination of Six-Phase Turbo Generators Inductive Resistances for Transient Analysis: Abstract ... Cand. Sci. (Eng.)). SPb., 2020, 22 p.
8. Popkov E.N., Feshin A.O. Izvestiya NTTs Edinoy energeti-cheskoy sistemy – in Russ. (Proceedings of the Scientific and Technical Center of the Unified Energy System), 2020, No. 2 (83), pp. 64–73.
9. Kato S., Rae G., Michihira M. A Comparative Study on Power Generation Characteristics of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators for Green Ship. – Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, 2012, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 378–386, DOI: 10.5916/jkosme.2012.36.3.378.
10. Labak A., Kar N.C. Designing and Prototyping a Novel Five-Phase Pancake-Shaped Axial-Flux SRM for Electric Vehicle Application Through Dynamic FEA Incorporating Flux-Tube Modeling. – IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2013, vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 1276–1288, DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2013.2252871.
11. Ismagilov F.R. et al. The Six-Phase Fault Tolerant Synchronous Generator with Permanent Magnets for Aircraft Application. – Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing, 2020, DOI: 10.1109/ICIEAM48468.2020.9112055.
12. Levi E. Multiphase Electric Machines for Variable-Speed Applications. – IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2008, vol. 55, No. 5, pp.1893–1909, DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2008.918488.
13. Zechihin B.S., Zhuravlev S.V., Misyutin R.Yu. Elektri-chestvo – in Russ. (Electricity), 2018, No. 6, pp. 49–59.
14. Barrero F., Duran M.J. Recent Advances in the Design, Modeling, and Control of Multiphase Machines – Part I. – IEEE Trans-actions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 449–458. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2447733.
15. Barrero F., Duran M.J. Recent Advances in the Design, Modeling and Control of Multiphase Machines – Part II. – IEEE Trans-actions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 459–468, DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2448211.
16. Abdel-Khalik S., Ahmed S., Massoud A. A Six-Phase 24 Slot-10 Pole Permanent-Magnet Machine with Low Space Harmonics for Electric Vehicle Applications. – IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, vol. 52, No. 6, DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2535230.
17. Wang J. et al. Study of Multiphase Superconducting Wind Generators with Fractional-Slot Concentrated Windings. – IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2014, vol. 24, No. 3, DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2014.2304300.
18. Karttunen J. et al. Decoupled Vector Control Scheme for Dual Three-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines. – IEEE Trans-actions on Industrial Electronics, 2014, vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 2185–2196. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2013.2270219.
19. Bouyahia O., Betin F., Yazidi A. Fault-Tolerant Fuzzy Logic Control of a 6-Phase Axial Flux Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Generator. – Energies, 2022, vol. 15, No. 4, DOI: 10.3390/en15041301.
20. Goncalves P.F.C., Cruz S.M.A., Mendes A.M.S. Comparison of Model Predictive Control Strategies for Six-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines. – 44th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2018, pp. 5801–5806, DOI: 10.1109/IECON.2018.8591239.
21. Naves P.H.B. et al. Modelling and Comparative Performance Analysis of Special Six-phase and Conventional Synchronous Generators for Wind Farm Application. – Renewable Energy & Power Quality Journal, 2009, vol. 1, No. 7, pp. 390–395, DOI: 10.24084/REPQJ07.367.
22. Antipov V.N., Grozov A.D., Ivanova A.V. Elektrichestvo – in Russ. (Electricity), 2025, No. 2, pp. 75–83.
23. Neyman L.R. Poverhnostnyy effekt v ferromagnitnyh telah (The Surface Effect in Ferromagnetic Bodies). M.: Gosenergoizdat, 1948, 190 p
---
The work was carried out within the framework of the State Assignment of the NRC Kurchatov Institute Branch PNPI IChS (topic registration number 1024030700042-1-1.4.3)
